We develop and own distributed solar. We also advise the owners deciding whether to build. We hold what we build, so your project gets the same underwriting as our own capital. Sometimes the answer is no.
Most developers are paid to build. It shows in their advice. We tell you to own solar only when the project clears the same underwriting we run on the assets we keep. When it does not clear, we say so in writing, with the reasoning. Own it, host it, or walk away. The standard does not move.
You do not need to become a solar expert to make this decision. That is the point of hiring one.
Solar is our full-time job so it does not have to be yours. This is the entire ask, end to end.
You have a roof, a bill, and a decision. We tell you if the project clears the bar: own it, host it, or pass. If it clears, we run the development.
Procurement rules, board calendars, and public scrutiny change the math. We build the proposal, the incentive strategy, and the paper trail. All three survive review.
Your array is built and producing. Were you paid everything the programs owe you? Twelve months of statements answers it.
Most of the risk in distributed solar sits in the two years before a panel is installed. That is the part we do ourselves, before you commit capital.
The recommendation is not tied to a sale. That is the reason to hire an advisor instead of a developer working a quota.
The recommendation measures one thing: whether the project is worth owning. Nothing else sits behind it.
Usage, roof, tax position, capital plan. A proposal comes after the math, never before.
A project that does not pencil is one we tell you to walk away from. We put that in writing. We would rather lose the build than sign bad math.
The structure fits your balance sheet. The underwriting never changes.
Five steps. You can stop after any of them. Most of the value lands before a panel is ordered.
Send the address and twelve months of usage. You get a straight read within days. No cost, no commitment.
We model the project to our own standard: production, interconnection cost, incentive stack, and the full operating case.
Own, lease, or do not build. In writing, with the numbers and the reasoning. This is what you are paying for.
Interconnection, permitting, competitive procurement, and construction oversight. Managed on your behalf.
Monitoring, O&M oversight, and incentive reporting for the life of the asset.
Connecticut REC and incentive programs pay on reported production. Reporting is where money goes missing. Misread meters. Mismatched enrollment. True-ups nobody chased. You do not need to have built with us.
Twelve months of production data and your REC or incentive statements. That is all it takes.
Production against payment, program by program, until the shortfall is on the table.
We tell you whether there is money to recover before you commit to anything.
We handle the recovery and correct the reporting going forward.
Nothing. Send the address and the last twelve months of usage. We tell you whether the project is worth pursuing. The reconciliation read works the same way. You see whether there is money on the table before you commit to anything.
One email to start: the address and twelve months of usage. One meeting to walk through the recommendation. Signatures if you build. We carry the rest.
No. The recommendation is yours, in writing, with the numbers and the reasoning. It stands on its own. Most clients keep us on to run interconnection, permitting, procurement, and construction oversight. That is your decision after you have the answer, not a condition of getting it.
We own what we build. A project that does not pencil becomes our problem for the life of the asset, not just yours. Your project gets the same underwriting as our own capital. When it fails that test, saying so costs us a build and saves us both the years after it.
Twelve months of production data and your REC or incentive statements. We reconcile production against payment, program by program, and show you the gap first. If there is money to recover, we scope the recovery engagement then. You know the number before you spend anything.
Connecticut is home and the market we know deepest. The reconciliation practice runs here. We hold operating projects in seven states and take on advisory work where we know the program as well as the market.
Three: you own the array and we develop it for you, you host it under a lease and we own and operate the system, or you do not build. The recommendation names one and shows the math behind all three.
“The advice is worth paying for precisely because we are willing to lose the build.”
Send the address and the last twelve months of usage. That is enough for a first read on whether it is worth either of our time.
Email us a site →Send twelve months of production data and your REC or incentive statements. We will tell you whether there is revenue to recover.
Request a reconciliation read →